Head of Stratfor, 'Private CIA,' Says Overthrow of
Yanukovych Was 'The Most Blatant Coup in History'
Eric Zuesse writes:
In a December 19th interview in the Russian magazineKommersant, George Friedman, who is the Founder and CEO of
Stratfor, the 'Shadow CIA' firm, says of the overthrow of Ukraine's President
Viktor Yanukovych that occurred on February 22nd of 2014: "It really was
the most blatant coup in history." Perhaps he is saying this because
of the videos that were uploaded to the Web
which showed it to be so, but
this statement by him contradicts the description that is asserted by the U.S.
White House and the European Union, and the Western press, which description is
that Yanukovych's overthrow was instead just the result of the U.S. Government's $5+ billion expense
since 1991 to establish 'democracy' in Ukraine.
Friedman further says that "The Russian authorities can not tolerate a situation in which western armed forces will be [in Ukraine] a hundred kilometers from Kursk or Voronezh [in Russia]", and that the goal of the U.S. is to "maintain the balance of power in Europe, helping the weaker party," which he says is Europe. He furthermore says, "The United States considers the most dangerous potential alliance to be between Russia and Germany. This would be an alliance of German technology and capital with Russian natural and human resources." So: the U.S. is trying to antagonize Germans against Russia. This will weaken both of them. However, that would be not a "balance of power" but an increasing imbalance of power in favor of the United States. The Russian interviewer failed to catch his inconsistency on that....
Friedman closed by saying, "Russia will not make concessions in the Crimea, this is obvious. But I believe that it could face serious problems with supplies to the peninsula. Yet Moscow can not retreat from some of its requirements with regard to Ukraine. It can not be allowed that Western military appear in Ukraine. This is a nightmare in Moscow. " This is already happening, slowly but occurs. And it will be something that Russia does not accept " The US is not aiming that you need to have control over Ukraine, but that it is important that it is not controlled by Russia." Here he was repeating his idea that America isn't seeking to achieve advantage over Russia -- that the U.S. has no hegemonic intentions, just "balance of power," notwithstanding the Commander-in-Chief's charge, months earlier, to his troops, for them to extend America's hegemony another century.
Friedman further says that "The Russian authorities can not tolerate a situation in which western armed forces will be [in Ukraine] a hundred kilometers from Kursk or Voronezh [in Russia]", and that the goal of the U.S. is to "maintain the balance of power in Europe, helping the weaker party," which he says is Europe. He furthermore says, "The United States considers the most dangerous potential alliance to be between Russia and Germany. This would be an alliance of German technology and capital with Russian natural and human resources." So: the U.S. is trying to antagonize Germans against Russia. This will weaken both of them. However, that would be not a "balance of power" but an increasing imbalance of power in favor of the United States. The Russian interviewer failed to catch his inconsistency on that....
Friedman closed by saying, "Russia will not make concessions in the Crimea, this is obvious. But I believe that it could face serious problems with supplies to the peninsula. Yet Moscow can not retreat from some of its requirements with regard to Ukraine. It can not be allowed that Western military appear in Ukraine. This is a nightmare in Moscow. " This is already happening, slowly but occurs. And it will be something that Russia does not accept " The US is not aiming that you need to have control over Ukraine, but that it is important that it is not controlled by Russia." Here he was repeating his idea that America isn't seeking to achieve advantage over Russia -- that the U.S. has no hegemonic intentions, just "balance of power," notwithstanding the Commander-in-Chief's charge, months earlier, to his troops, for them to extend America's hegemony another century.
He said that this overthrow in Ukraine was a coup aimed against Russia, but
then he closed with this statement that Russia is hegemonic but that the U.S.
is not, which contradicts it.
No comments:
Post a Comment